- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:50:59 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13359 --- Comment #15 from Bob Lund <b.lund@cablelabs.com> 2011-08-25 20:50:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Please note that there is no reason to quote the entirety of a comment when > replying. Either quote nothing or quote just what you are responding to. > > > Is there a _concrete_ example here? I really don't understand the use case > being presented. Re comment 3, for example, why would O be exposing content > from P? Content advisories will be added by the content producer. A aervice provider will ingest that content and insert ad insertion messages for doing targeted advertising in some markets, but not in others. The service provider will provide a page O representing the program guide to access this channel across those markets. So page O needs to deal with: a) a metadata text track containing the content advisories from the content producer and b)another metadata text track, which may or may not be present, containing ad insertion messages. There's a need to identify the type of parental control message used and to distinguish between the two different metadata text tracks in script. Even if there was agreement across content producers and service providers about message types one is left with the question of how does script distinguish between the tracks in the case there is multiple metadata text tracks source from in-band tracks in the media resource. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:51:04 UTC