- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 19:31:46 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13514 --- Comment #4 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-08-07 19:31:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Vector graphics is another, better, solution - they work at every resolution. > > Just provide the image in SVG format. > > Agreed, however the use of SVG in the wild is still not really very widespread, > there aren't many editors that support the format etc. Sure, but trying to work around one unsupported feature by introducing another feature (which by definition isn't yet supported) isn't generally a winning game plan. ^_^ As long as the first feature is expected to be supported more widely (which SVG is), time will solve the problem for you without any new features needed. > Also if the spec could > indicate that displaying controls in SVG or other vector formats had benefits > like those outlined, that would be helpful. While it's not fully germane to > HTML 5, this would help in situations that Greg outlines (if authors where are > that vector graphics didn't pixelated and understood the benefits of > scalability a la SVG etc). Sure, that might be nice. Could you file another bug saying so, perhaps with some example text to be inserted? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 7 August 2011 19:31:47 UTC