- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 06:35:14 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13651
John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |TrackerIssue
--- Comment #3 from John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> 2011-08-07 06:35:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE:
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: There's nothing wrong with verbose alternative text.
Please provide proof of this statement.
> Pictures, we
> are told, are worth a thousand words; textual alternatives of that length are
> not out of the question.
This is incorrect.
Sufficient Techniques for 1.1.1 - Non-text Content:
Situation A: If a short description can serve the same purpose and present the
same information as the non-text content:
G94: Providing short text alternative for non-text content that serves the same
purpose and presents the same information as the non-text content using a short
text alternative technique listed below
Situation B: If a short description can not serve the same purpose and present
the same information as the non-text content (e.g., a chart or diagram):
G95: Providing short text alternatives that provide a brief description of the
non-text content using a short text alternative technique listed below AND one
of the following techniques for long description:
G92: Providing long description for non-text content that serves the same
purpose and presents the same information using a long text alternative
technique listed below
G74: Providing a long description in text near the non-text content, with
a reference to the location of the long description in the short description
G73: Providing a long description in another location with a link to it
that is immediately adjacent to the non-text content
http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/#text-equiv
> There is no usability problem here
Please provide proof of this statement.
> since an AT can
> just provide a way for the user to signal that it should move on to something
> more interesting.
Please provide proof of this statement.
TrackerIssue
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 7 August 2011 06:35:16 UTC