- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:00:50 +0100
- To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Cc: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=dcSS+P5FCneKQHoewcNG5uFyVMqn-L0GXS-3-@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Leif, >Many ARIA supporting ATs doesn't actually seem to support this. :-( i don't think this is a correct statement. >Jaws11+Firefox3.6.9 is a quite common AT: It supports aria-labelledby. >But fails to expose (to users) labels that have been hidden with CSS >display:none or visibility:hidden. worked for me for both aria-describedby and aria-labelledby referencing a div hidden using CSS display:none > And Jaws+IE7 at least isn't any better. and so it shouldn't be since IE7 does not implement ARIA support. regards Stevef On 11 September 2010 11:09, Leif Halvard Silli < xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote: > James Craig, Fri, 10 Sep 2010: > >> "That's correct. The label of visible elements should still be > >> exposed to accessibility APIs (as a computed string), even if the > >> labeling element (that contained all or some of that string) is > >> hidden." > > Many ARIA supporting ATs doesn't actually seem to support this. :-( > See below. > > James Craig, Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:25:01 -0700: > > The spec recommends authors always SHOULD update the value of > > aria-hidden, but in practice, when using visibility:hidden or > > display:none it's rarely needed since all popular screen readers rely > > on rendering engine support. Less common AT that is not supported by > > a rendering engine (I think only FireVox, atm) relies on the DOM > > being updated correctly, too. > > Aria-hidden="true" is probably most useful as a progressive enhancement > feature for those AT that supports it. Example: > > Jaws11+Firefox3.6.9 is a quite common AT: It supports aria-labelledby. > But fails to expose (to users) labels that have been hidden with CSS > display:none or visibility:hidden. And Jaws+IE7 at least isn't any > better. > > VoiceOver respects aria-hidden regardless of whether the element is > actually hidden (via CSS), whereas Jaws+Firefox and NVDA+Firefox seems > to fail to give any regard to aria-hidden whatsoever. > > Since common AT do not expose hidden labels, it might be best to, for > maximum compatibility, to hide labels via other means, such as > off-screen positioning. However, this could cause AT to present labels > twice. But by setting such labels to aria-hidden="true", one can at > least make sure that supporting AT, such as VoiceOver, does not read > the labels twice. > -- > leif halvard silli > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2010 13:01:44 UTC