- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:59:18 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10481
steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |faulkner.steve@gmail.com
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-09-08 08:59:18 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: For most images, role=img is unsuitable, because the <img> doesn't
> represent an image, but something else (e.g. text as part of a link).
2 questions:
1. Can you provide data to back that up?
2. does this mean that a user agent that maps an <img> to a role="img" by
default is non conforming?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 08:59:20 UTC