- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:50:52 +0100
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20101021154914.M78784@hicom.net>
aloha!
thanks to marco ranon for scribing at the 21 October 2010 telecon,
minutes of which are available as hypertext at:
http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-html-a11y-minutes.html
as an IRC log at:
http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-html-a11y-irc
and as plain text following this announcement -- as usual, please log
any corrections, clarifications, mis-attributions, omissions and the
like by repllying-to this announcement on-list
URGENT REMINDER! SPREAD THE WORD! 2 CRITICAL HTML WG POLLS CLOSE TODAY!
HTML5 Survey 1:
ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility and ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap - Straw Poll
for Objections
* http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/74
* http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/105
* http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/
* http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/results
HTML5 Survey 2:
ISSUE-32: how to provide a summary of a table, e.g. for unsighted
navigation? - Straw Poll for Objections
Change Proposals for ISSUE-32:
* http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Summary_Change_Proposal_Nov_18%2C_2009
* http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/SummaryAttribute20100222
* http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jul/0052.html
SURVEY FOR ISSUE-32:
* http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-32-objection-poll/
* http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-32-objection-poll/results
note, too, there is a third HTML5 Survey on ISSUE 89: Remove Section 4.13
Common Idioms without dedicated Elements - Straw Poll for Objections
* http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/89
* http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-89-objection-poll/
* http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-89-objection-poll/results
_________________________________________________________
- DRAFT -
HTML-A11Y telecon
21 Oct 2010
Agenda
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Oct/0546.html
See also: IRC log - http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-html-a11y-irc
Attendees
Present
John_Foliot, Janina, Gregory_Rosmaita, Eric_Carlson,
Michael_Cooper, Everett_Zufelt, jongund, kliehm, Marco_Ranon,
Cynthia_Shelly, Mike
Regrets
Laura_Carlson, Joshue_O'Connor, Sylvia_Pfieffer,
Denis_Boudreau, Kenny_Johar
Chair
Mike
Scribe
Marco_Ranon
Contents
* Topics
1. Actions Review
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open
2. clarify proper handling of ARIA issues vs. ARIA-in-HTML
mapping
3. Subteam Reports: Bug Triage; Media; Canvas; ARIA
Mappings
4. next meetings, confirm date/time, choose scribe
5. New Business
* Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<MikeSmith> janina, judy - OK, I have it reverted now
<janina> agenda: this
ok
no worries
<oedipus> scribe: Marco_Ranon
<oedipus> scribenick: Marco_Ranon
Actions Review http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open
MC: all action are complete
clarify proper handling of ARIA issues vs. ARIA-in-HTML mapping
JS: deadline for ARIA. not strictly HTML matter but there is the
mapping to HTML5
... if anybody want to raise questions, bear in mind that the
mapping is a separate process
... if somebody is looking at ARIA, be aware that there is a
deadline coming in a week time
MS: did we decide what process should be followed?
<MichaelC> ARIA comment instructions
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/comments/instructions
<oedipus> public-pfwg-comments@w3.org
<oedipus>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments
MS: for clarity, comments about ARIA specs for semantic, etc, go to
the PF, using the form (currently down)
... issues related to use of ARIA attributes in HTML, should go
through the HTML bug reporting procedure
<oedipus> HTML WG bugzilla entry form:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG
<kliehm> List of HTML5 ARIA bugs:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=aria
Subteam Reports: Bug Triage; Media; Canvas; ARIA Mappings
<oedipus> minutes of 2010-10-19 bug triage team meeting:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Oct/0519.html
MK: Bug Triage, we checked a number of bugs adding the a11ytf
keyword
... at TPAC we should decide what to do next and how to proceed next
I'll be there
<oedipus> GJR will be there virtually
MR, MK, MC will be at TPAC
JF: Media, met yesterday after three weeks
<oedipus> media sub-team telecon minutes from 20 October 2010:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Oct/0539.html
JF: concern about integration of media text in HTML specs
<oedipus> media: spec text additions update from janina:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Oct/0524.html
JS: we need to file bugs regarding reference to WebSRT
... we are looking at timestamp format and multiple tracks
JF: WebSRT is currently into the draft so we can file bugs
<oedipus>
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#timed-tracks-0
<oedipus>
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#websrt-cue-text-rendering-rules
MS: Canvas, skip because Richard is not on
<oedipus>
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#applying-css-properties-to-websrt-node-objects
MS: ARIA mapping, already discussed, nothing to add
<JF>
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/
<oedipus>
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/results
JF: poll for canvas expires today
<oedipus> table summary poll:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-32-objection-poll/
closes today
<oedipus> table summary poll:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-32-objection-poll/results
MS: not many responses
... anybody that hasn't responded yet, please take your time to
respond to the poll if you have anything you want to say about
canvas
<oedipus> frankoliver, could you please review and respond to
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/
<frankolivier> will do
<oedipus> thanks
CS: please ask directly to who could be interested to answer, to do
so
next meetings, confirm date/time, choose scribe
MS: both canvas and table summary
... meeitng next wekk?
<oedipus> MikeSmith, when is the publishing TPAC moritorium in
effect?
<MikeSmith> oedipus, can't remember for sure
<MikeSmith> will check right now
JS: we should meet, even if we are close to TPAC
JF: would like to participate virtually.
MS: we can discuss it formally next week
AOB
CS: call for help for mapping work
New Business
JF: what kind of help
CS: HTML: check the document and make suggestions
... ARIA mapping: go through issues raised on the document
CS to send links to documents
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 15:51:24 UTC