- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:50:52 +0100
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20101021154914.M78784@hicom.net>
aloha! thanks to marco ranon for scribing at the 21 October 2010 telecon, minutes of which are available as hypertext at: http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-html-a11y-minutes.html as an IRC log at: http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-html-a11y-irc and as plain text following this announcement -- as usual, please log any corrections, clarifications, mis-attributions, omissions and the like by repllying-to this announcement on-list URGENT REMINDER! SPREAD THE WORD! 2 CRITICAL HTML WG POLLS CLOSE TODAY! HTML5 Survey 1: ISSUE-74: canvas-accessibility and ISSUE-105 canvas-usemap - Straw Poll for Objections * http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/74 * http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/105 * http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/ * http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/results HTML5 Survey 2: ISSUE-32: how to provide a summary of a table, e.g. for unsighted navigation? - Straw Poll for Objections Change Proposals for ISSUE-32: * http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Summary_Change_Proposal_Nov_18%2C_2009 * http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/SummaryAttribute20100222 * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jul/0052.html SURVEY FOR ISSUE-32: * http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-32-objection-poll/ * http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-32-objection-poll/results note, too, there is a third HTML5 Survey on ISSUE 89: Remove Section 4.13 Common Idioms without dedicated Elements - Straw Poll for Objections * http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/89 * http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-89-objection-poll/ * http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-89-objection-poll/results _________________________________________________________ - DRAFT - HTML-A11Y telecon 21 Oct 2010 Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Oct/0546.html See also: IRC log - http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-html-a11y-irc Attendees Present John_Foliot, Janina, Gregory_Rosmaita, Eric_Carlson, Michael_Cooper, Everett_Zufelt, jongund, kliehm, Marco_Ranon, Cynthia_Shelly, Mike Regrets Laura_Carlson, Joshue_O'Connor, Sylvia_Pfieffer, Denis_Boudreau, Kenny_Johar Chair Mike Scribe Marco_Ranon Contents * Topics 1. Actions Review http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open 2. clarify proper handling of ARIA issues vs. ARIA-in-HTML mapping 3. Subteam Reports: Bug Triage; Media; Canvas; ARIA Mappings 4. next meetings, confirm date/time, choose scribe 5. New Business * Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <MikeSmith> janina, judy - OK, I have it reverted now <janina> agenda: this ok no worries <oedipus> scribe: Marco_Ranon <oedipus> scribenick: Marco_Ranon Actions Review http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open MC: all action are complete clarify proper handling of ARIA issues vs. ARIA-in-HTML mapping JS: deadline for ARIA. not strictly HTML matter but there is the mapping to HTML5 ... if anybody want to raise questions, bear in mind that the mapping is a separate process ... if somebody is looking at ARIA, be aware that there is a deadline coming in a week time MS: did we decide what process should be followed? <MichaelC> ARIA comment instructions http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/comments/instructions <oedipus> public-pfwg-comments@w3.org <oedipus> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg-comments MS: for clarity, comments about ARIA specs for semantic, etc, go to the PF, using the form (currently down) ... issues related to use of ARIA attributes in HTML, should go through the HTML bug reporting procedure <oedipus> HTML WG bugzilla entry form: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG <kliehm> List of HTML5 ARIA bugs: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=HTML+WG&keywords=aria Subteam Reports: Bug Triage; Media; Canvas; ARIA Mappings <oedipus> minutes of 2010-10-19 bug triage team meeting: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Oct/0519.html MK: Bug Triage, we checked a number of bugs adding the a11ytf keyword ... at TPAC we should decide what to do next and how to proceed next I'll be there <oedipus> GJR will be there virtually MR, MK, MC will be at TPAC JF: Media, met yesterday after three weeks <oedipus> media sub-team telecon minutes from 20 October 2010: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Oct/0539.html JF: concern about integration of media text in HTML specs <oedipus> media: spec text additions update from janina: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Oct/0524.html JS: we need to file bugs regarding reference to WebSRT ... we are looking at timestamp format and multiple tracks JF: WebSRT is currently into the draft so we can file bugs <oedipus> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#timed-tracks-0 <oedipus> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#websrt-cue-text-rendering-rules MS: Canvas, skip because Richard is not on <oedipus> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#applying-css-properties-to-websrt-node-objects MS: ARIA mapping, already discussed, nothing to add <JF> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/ <oedipus> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/results JF: poll for canvas expires today <oedipus> table summary poll: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-32-objection-poll/ closes today <oedipus> table summary poll: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-32-objection-poll/results MS: not many responses ... anybody that hasn't responded yet, please take your time to respond to the poll if you have anything you want to say about canvas <oedipus> frankoliver, could you please review and respond to http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/ <frankolivier> will do <oedipus> thanks CS: please ask directly to who could be interested to answer, to do so next meetings, confirm date/time, choose scribe MS: both canvas and table summary ... meeitng next wekk? <oedipus> MikeSmith, when is the publishing TPAC moritorium in effect? <MikeSmith> oedipus, can't remember for sure <MikeSmith> will check right now JS: we should meet, even if we are close to TPAC JF: would like to participate virtually. MS: we can discuss it formally next week AOB CS: call for help for mapping work New Business JF: what kind of help CS: HTML: check the document and make suggestions ... ARIA mapping: go through issues raised on the document CS to send links to documents Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 15:51:24 UTC