- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:13:54 +1100
- To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
Sorry, of course I meant bug reports that would provide changes. Silvia. On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Janina, for following up on this and making sure it progresses. > > It seems we next have to make change proposals to make this more > technology neutral. Might be another topic for today's call. > > Cheers, > Silvia. > > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> Current status: >> >> a) The indicated sections have been incorporated. >> >> b) The work to make the these sections technology neutral is not complete. >> Bug reports are encouraged in order to enable further progress. >> >> c) Meanwhile, the following HTML5 spec text sections have been marked as >> blocking progress to last call: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/video.html#the-track-element >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/video.html#timed-tracks >> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/rendering.html#timed-tracks-0 >> >> - Sam Ruby >> >> On 09/27/2010 06:27 PM, Janina Sajka wrote: >>> >>> Colleagues: >>> >>> This request is being sent on behalf of the HTML-A11Y Task Force's Media >>> Subteam. >>> >>> Some time ago we requested removal of certain media related sections >>> from W3C's HTML 5 specification documents because a specific technology >>> solution was being introduced, whereas it was the Subteam's strong >>> viewpoint that this was premature and counter-productive. We are now at >>> the point where we would like this text returned to our W3C documents, >>> however, still without any admixture of specific technology solutions. >>> >>> The Subteam notes that two of these three sections were first drafted in >>> W3C space, but have been improved in key respects by the WHAT-WG. We >>> believe it would be fairly straight forward to return two of the three >>> sections we need without the technology specific language. The third >>> section we need will, in our view, require a bit more effort to >>> introduce in a technology neutral manner. >>> >>> Mindful that heartbeat releases of HTML 5 specification documentsare >>> imminent, we request your guidance on how to proceed. >>> >>> Shall we request the Editor make these modifications and introduce these >>> sections into W3C documents without the technology specific language? >>> Before or after the heartbeat publication? We'd prefer before so that we >>> can begin work on these right away. However, some short delay would not >>> slow us down drastically. We understand there are competing priorities >>> here. >>> >>> Or, should we undertake first redrafting these sections to remove the >>> technology specific references ourselves? >>> >>> The three sections we would like added to our W3C documents are: >>> >>> ITEM 1. The<track> element >>> >>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#the-t >>> rack-element >>> >>> ITEM 2. The Timed Text spec >>> >>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/video.html#timed >>> -tracks >>> >>> ITEM 3. The rendering rules >>> >>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/rendering.html#t >>> imed-tracks-0 >>> >>> Further specificity regarding this request can be found at: >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Sep/051 8.html >>> >>> Thank you for your guidance. >>> >>> Janina >>> >> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 22:14:48 UTC