- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:58:48 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10916 --- Comment #7 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2010-10-04 17:58:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > The main use case is for editing tools. Browsers wouldn't be expected to do > anything with the element - on the contrary they should be discouraged from > doing anything special with the element. What are some specific things an editing tool could do with the knowledge that an element is a control, but without knowing anything more specific about its behavior or semantics (since those are presumably still specific to individual scripting libraries)? Or, if this is meant to be used with a specific scripting library known to the editing tool, rather than generic to any scripting library, it seems like the scripting library and editing tool could come to a private arrangement on how to convey this info (e.g. with data-* attributes or specific use of class names). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 4 October 2010 17:58:55 UTC