- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:02:58 +0000
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Cc: "Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>, "Michael Cooper (cooper@w3.org)" <cooper@w3.org>
aloha, again! i mistyped: > what we need for disposition of issue 180 when i should have referred to issue 122 apologies for any confusion, gregory ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net> To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org> Cc: "Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>, "Michael Cooper (cooper@w3.org)" <cooper@w3.org> Sent: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:51:01 +0000 Subject: Re: FW: ISSUE-122 (shalott-example) - Expanded scope and Call for Counter-Proposals > aloha, paul! > > what we need for disposition of issue 180 is to remove the lady > of shallott example out from: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#the-img-element > > which directly follows the following prose: > > QUOTE > Examples where the image is purely decorative despite being > relevant would include things like a photo of the Black Rock > City landscape in a blog post about an event at Burning Man, or > an image of a painting inspired by a poem, on a page reciting > that poem. The following snippet shows an example of the latter case: > UNQUOTE > > steps: > > 1. remove the phrase "or an image of a painting inspired by a > poem, on a page reciting that poem" > > 2. replace the current (lady of shallott) example with an code sample > illustrating one of the other prose examples that hixie cites in > the paragraph introducing the example, such as a blog of Black > Rock City that uses a picture of the city's skyline as a purely > decorative element of a blog > > gregory. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > CONSERVATIVE, n. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, > as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them > with others. -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_ > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net > Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > To: "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org> > Cc: "Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> (janina@rednote.net)" > <janina@rednote.net>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" > <mike@w3.org>, "Michael Cooper (cooper@w3.org)" <cooper@w3.org> > Sent: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:44:28 +0000 Subject: FW: ISSUE-122 > (shalott-example) - Expanded scope and Call for Counter-Proposals > > > At today's Accessibility review session, we decided to bring > > this item directly to the attention of the A11Y TF so that it > > could be discussed on the A11Y TF list and so that this > > discussion could be added to the TF meeting on Nov 11. > > > > Note the following dated item: > > > > > Therefore, please submit counter-proposals, alternate proposals and > revised proposals for this issue by November 27, with the understanding > that it applies to all HTML WG publications. > > > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html- > > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Maciej Stachowiak Sent: Wednesday, > > October 27, 2010 2:12 PM To: Sam Ruby Cc: HTMLWG WG Subject: > > ISSUE-122 (shalott-example) - Expanded scope and Call for > > Counter-Proposals > > > > After further discussion, the Chairs thing it would make more > > sense to expand this issue to apply to all WG deliverables, > > including the HTML5 draft. This raises a few issues: > > > > 1) This was not duly indicated to the WG in advance. So we're > > not going to hold to the call for consensus. > > > > 2) The Change Proposal submitted does not express the relevant > > changes to the HTML5 draft, it only gives detail for the alt- > > requirements draft. Therefore it needs to be revised. > > > > 3) Since the null change proposal would, upon updating, call for > > a change, we expect there will be new interest in writing > > counter-proposals. > > > > Therefore, please submit counter-proposals, alternate proposals > > and revised proposals for this issue by November 27, with the > > understanding that it applies to all HTML WG publications. > > > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/122 > > > > Regards, > > Maciej > > > > On Oct 20, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > > Current status is that we have had a call for proposals: > > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0182.html > > > > > > We received a null change proposal: > > > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0182.html > > > > > > And we have received an indication that the original proposer does not > have the time to pursue this: > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9077#c8 > > > > > > If there are no objections, we will close ISSUE-122 on October 28th. > > > > > > - Sam Ruby > > > > ------- End of Original Message ------- ------- End of Original Message -------
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 09:03:29 UTC