- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:01:41 -0600
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi Sam and Janina, On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > John Foliot wrote: >> >> Would it be helpful to the chairs if the A11y Task Force come back with >> some proposed dates and times/timelines instead of the dart-board choice >> of April 15th? > > Yes, it would be helpful if the A11y Task Force were to come back with an > updated A11Y timeline for all tracker related issues. Action 170 was opened > on 2010-01-19, with an original target date of 2010-01-28: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/170?changelog I think that there may be some confusion over the type of Action 170 is. Was the idea for Janina's Action 170 to be a permanent reporting action? Or was it to be a one time thing? Janina asked about this February 10. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0271.html These are the accessibility issues http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Issues#Open_Issues Accessibility Change Proposal Status http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Accessibility_Change_Proposal_Status I agree would be good to have reasonable and realistic dates. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > John Foliot wrote: >> >> Would it be helpful to the chairs if the A11y Task Force come back with >> some proposed dates and times/timelines instead of the dart-board choice >> of April 15th? > > Yes, it would be helpful if the A11y Task Force were to come back with an > updated A11Y timeline for all tracker related issues. Action 170 was opened > on 2010-01-19, with an original target date of 2010-01-28: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/170?changelog > >> Cheers! >> >> JF > > - Sam Ruby On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > This issue has been open for over two years, and there has been much > discussion. It was originally raised before the current decision > policy went into effect. Discussion has died down, and per the decision > policy, at this time the chairs would like to solicit volunteers to write > Change Proposals. > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9 > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation > > If no Change Proposals are written by April 5, 2010 this issue will > be closed without prejudice. > > Issue status link: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-009 > > - Sam Ruby -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 19:02:18 UTC