Re: Issue-9 (video-accessibility): Chairs Solicit Proposals

Hi Sam and Janina,

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> John Foliot wrote:
>>
>> Would it be helpful to the chairs if the A11y Task Force come back with
>> some proposed dates and times/timelines instead of the dart-board choice
>> of April 15th?
>
> Yes, it would be helpful if the A11y Task Force were to come back with an
> updated A11Y timeline for all tracker related issues.  Action 170 was opened
> on 2010-01-19, with an original target date of 2010-01-28:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/170?changelog

I think that there may be some confusion over  the type of  Action 170 is.

Was the idea for Janina's Action 170 to be a permanent reporting
action? Or was it to be a one time thing? Janina asked about this
February 10.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0271.html

These are the accessibility issues
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Issues#Open_Issues

Accessibility Change Proposal Status
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Accessibility_Change_Proposal_Status

I agree would be good to have reasonable and realistic dates.

Best Regards,
Laura
-- 
Laura L. Carlson


On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> John Foliot wrote:
>>
>> Would it be helpful to the chairs if the A11y Task Force come back with
>> some proposed dates and times/timelines instead of the dart-board choice
>> of April 15th?
>
> Yes, it would be helpful if the A11y Task Force were to come back with an
> updated A11Y timeline for all tracker related issues.  Action 170 was opened
> on 2010-01-19, with an original target date of 2010-01-28:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/170?changelog
>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> JF
>
> - Sam Ruby


On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> This issue has been open for over two years, and there has been much
> discussion. It was originally raised before the current decision
> policy went into effect.  Discussion has died down, and per the decision
> policy, at this time the chairs would like to solicit volunteers to write
> Change Proposals.
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation
>
> If no Change Proposals are written by April 5, 2010 this issue will
> be closed without prejudice.
>
> Issue status link:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-009
>
> - Sam Ruby


-- 
Laura L. Carlson