- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:58:39 -0800
- To: Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
- Cc: "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
I think that SMIL is considered one of the file types you could reference in a video element, (if you know the UA can cope with it)... On Feb 15, 2010, at 15:44 , Geoff Freed wrote: > > With all this discussion over the past week regarding the coordination of <video> with caption/subtitle/description/karoke, etc., tracks, I am reminded of a question that I and a few others asked last fall when this group was formed: why is SMIL not being considered to take care of track synchronization, selection and activation? I know that there were objections to the size of SMIL, but there wasn't much discussion about implementing only specific modules rather than the whole huge spec. All this talk about <tracks> and <trackgroup> make me think we should be taking advantage of SMIL's <par> and <switch> elements, for example. > > So... what are the reasons SMIL modules (http://www.w3.org/TR/SMIL/smil-modules.html) aren't being considered? > > Thanks. > Geoff/WGBH > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 23:59:11 UTC