- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:46:07 +0000
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
aloha, david! the video is the video itself, full stop... the poster image is akin to either a conventional movie poster (with the names of actors, other credits, copyright info, and running time -- the two are NOT the same, just like the DVD/Bluray disc you put into a player is the "video" portion of the equation, the packaging usually contains a version of the film's original release poster with added information which most probably will NOT be included in a single frame, which may be the "title card" for the movie, the first frame of the opening credits, or simply a black frame containing nothing that can be consumed by anyone... thus, video and poster are VASTLY different concepts, and while i agree that the 3 points you highlighted need to be urgently addressed, so too does the video and poster issue -- a single frame of a video may be completely meaningless to those who cannot visually process it, making the information contained in the poster essential -- especially if it indicates that audio description, closed captioning, and multiple language tracks are available gregory. ---------------------------------------------------- The optimist thinks that this is the best of all possible worlds; the pessimist knows it is. ---------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita: gregory@linux-foundation.org Vice-Chair & Webmaster, Open Accessibility Workgroup http://a11y.org/ http://a11y.org/specs/ ---------------------------------------------------- ---------- Original Message ----------- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com> To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org> Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Sent: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:27:52 -0600 Subject: Re: Video Poster image (was RE: DRAFT analysis of fallback mechanisms for embedded content ACTION-66) > I agree, a poster IS the video. we should not encourage bad > practices by pretending/allowing otherwise. > > I have three questions about annotating audio/video resources: > can I > (a) provide a short "alt" text? for video > (b) provide a long description? > (c) link to a transcript? > > These seem to be more important, to me, than worrying about > whether the poster is semantically different from the video. > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. ------- End of Original Message -------
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 16:46:44 UTC