- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 19:25:34 +0000
- To: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>, "public-houdini@w3.org" <public-houdini@w3.org>
On 3/3/15, 11:05 AM, "Rossen Atanassov" <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alan Stearns [mailto:stearns@adobe.com] >> Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 2:49 PM >> >> Hey all, >> >> At TPAC last year and the CSS meeting in Sydney, a representative from >>LG >> gave a presentation [1] on the CSS extensions they'd like to see for >>round >> displays. One extensions was to position elements using polar >>coordinates. >> I'm thinking that this might be a good case to consider as we develop >>custom >> layout. > >The actual positioning using polar coordinates shouldn't be the hard part >from the proposal. Everything else that was desired will be much more >demanding - shaping borders, flowing/stacking content etc. I'm interested >to explore the possibilities here but I'm afraid there's much more work >that's a prerequisite this. I agree that the polar coordinate part should be relatively easy. That’s why I thought it would be an interesting case to study. It can be polyfilled now, more or less. I expect that custom layout should make a polar coordinate polyfill *better* in some way, or at least have a good story for why it doesn’t. The simplicity of this feature could make it easy to evaluate and discuss the improvements. Thanks, Alan
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 19:26:08 UTC