Re: Generating June 9 working drafts

For EME, I believe the auto-publication automatically generates these URLs.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure how the WD appeared where it did, but I can also confirm that
> we are good to go. The diff between the latest ED in GitHub and the WD URL
> is here
> <http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fencrypted-media%2F3aca5b6c045d0a6d3c8cbd8a96f31d18c831be9c%2Findex.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2016%2FWD-encrypted-media-20160610%2F>
> .
>
> ...Mark
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:42 PM, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, we are good. I see you sent the CfC.
>>
>> Editors, try to remember NOT to commit anything tomorrow. I think that
>> will overwrite this dated URL.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Since it is past 11:30pm EDT and since I can see recent changes in at
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/ I am going
>>> forward with the EME CfC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /paulc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:17 PM
>>> *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; David Dorwin <
>>> ddorwin@google.com>
>>> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>;
>>> public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>>
>>> *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> With all the EME V1 issues closed and with the issue boxes we agreed to
>>> being removed, I am ready to issue the EME CR CfC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Are all the recent changes reflect in the “June 10 Editors Draft” branch
>>> at  http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can at least one of the EME Editors confirm we are ready to go?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> /paulc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Jerry Smith (WPT)
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 10:43 PM
>>> *To:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
>>> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton <
>>> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>;
>>> public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>> *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You caught me a moment too late.  I entered this comment:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Issue #246 carries forward some discussion topics for EME during CR.
>>> Issue #110 is closed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I’m off, please correct.  I’m heading out now though.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks David.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jerry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com <ddorwin@google.com>]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:41 PM
>>> *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
>>> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton <
>>> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>;
>>> public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> #246 is just related, but not a replacement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm still replying to Henri. I hate to close the conversation on him.
>>> You might at least note that the conversation can continue, but we consider
>>> the original blocking item addressed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I’m going to assume yes based on David’s LGTM below.  #110 is now closed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David:  Please confirm when you see this.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jerry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Jerry Smith (WPT) [mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:36 PM
>>> *To:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
>>> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton <
>>> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>;
>>> public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>>
>>> *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Might we close #110 to reflect we are ready, issue #85 as a noted
>>> exception?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com <ddorwin@google.com>]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:33 PM
>>> *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
>>> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton <
>>> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>;
>>> public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jerry has landed it. The spec LGTM.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I’m working on it now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:06 PM
>>> *To:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
>>> *Cc:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Paul Cotton <
>>> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>;
>>> public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>>
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 7:03 PM, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jerry or Mark, can you remove those four?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I could remove them, but not until about 2-3 hours from now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ...Mark
>>>
>>> I'm replying to Henri in #110. I don't think it's strictly related to
>>> #110, so I don't consider that bocking.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps remove then #192, #207, #101 and #85; plus Issue 3?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That leaves #221, #219, #242 and #237 for cleanup during CR.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:50 PM
>>> *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
>>> *Cc:* Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <
>>> plh@w3.org>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>;
>>> public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>>
>>>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> One (ISSUE 3) does not have an issue, but I think we can remove it.
>>> Summary:
>>>
>>>    - #192, #207, #101: We could remove all those related to VNext
>>>    issues.
>>>    - #221: I think PING members plan to review now that we've addressed
>>>    #117, etc.
>>>    - ISSUE 3: I'm not sure there is anything to do here. I heard the
>>>    Second Screen CG is including this topic in their re-charter.
>>>    - #85: Covered by the at risk statement.
>>>    - #219, #242 and #237 seem like something we can address in CR.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There are 10 issue boxes in the spec, I believe all with active issues
>>> behind them.  I assumed they’d not be removed for CR, but perhaps later.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Paul Cotton
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:38 PM
>>> *To:* Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>;
>>> Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Jerry Smith (WPT) <
>>> jdsmith@microsoft.com>
>>> *Cc:* public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>> *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There are two red ISSUE boxes in the EME SOTD for #192 AND #221.  Can
>>> these be removed?  Are there any others in the document?
>>>
>>> <image001.jpg>
>>>
>>> /paulc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org <plh@w3.org>]
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:29 PM
>>> To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Matt Wolenetz <
>>> wolenetz@google.com>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
>>> Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>;
>>> public-hme-editors@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> One change here. Our systems [1] switched to tomorrow (June 10) already
>>> (?).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If it is issued, the CfC for EME will now have to use
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2016Jun/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>