- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:43:59 -0700
- To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "Jerry Smith (WPT)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, "public-hme-editors@w3.org" <public-hme-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdDYnwnMUWNovToT4Hjox=9JJU9VNat-5nMBdtxEmTkByQ@mail.gmail.com>
I'm not sure how the WD appeared where it did, but I can also confirm that we are good to go. The diff between the latest ED in GitHub and the WD URL is here <http://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fencrypted-media%2F3aca5b6c045d0a6d3c8cbd8a96f31d18c831be9c%2Findex.html&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2016%2FWD-encrypted-media-20160610%2F> . ...Mark On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:42 PM, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> wrote: > Yes, we are good. I see you sent the CfC. > > Editors, try to remember NOT to commit anything tomorrow. I think that > will overwrite this dated URL. > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> Since it is past 11:30pm EDT and since I can see recent changes in at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/ I am going >> forward with the EME CfC. >> >> >> >> /paulc >> >> >> >> *From:* Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:17 PM >> *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; David Dorwin < >> ddorwin@google.com> >> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; >> public-hme-editors@w3.org >> >> *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> With all the EME V1 issues closed and with the issue boxes we agreed to >> being removed, I am ready to issue the EME CR CfC. >> >> >> >> Are all the recent changes reflect in the “June 10 Editors Draft” branch >> at http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/? >> >> >> >> Can at least one of the EME Editors confirm we are ready to go? >> >> >> >> /paulc >> >> >> >> *From:* Jerry Smith (WPT) >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 10:43 PM >> *To:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> >> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton < >> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; >> public-hme-editors@w3.org >> *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> You caught me a moment too late. I entered this comment: >> >> >> >> Issue #246 carries forward some discussion topics for EME during CR. >> Issue #110 is closed. >> >> >> >> If I’m off, please correct. I’m heading out now though. >> >> >> >> Thanks David. >> >> >> >> Jerry >> >> >> >> *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com <ddorwin@google.com>] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:41 PM >> *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> >> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton < >> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; >> public-hme-editors@w3.org >> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> #246 is just related, but not a replacement. >> >> >> >> I'm still replying to Henri. I hate to close the conversation on him. You >> might at least note that the conversation can continue, but we consider the >> original blocking item addressed. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> >> I’m going to assume yes based on David’s LGTM below. #110 is now closed. >> >> >> >> David: Please confirm when you see this. >> >> >> >> Jerry >> >> >> >> *From:* Jerry Smith (WPT) [mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:36 PM >> *To:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> >> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton < >> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; >> public-hme-editors@w3.org >> >> *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> Might we close #110 to reflect we are ready, issue #85 as a noted >> exception? >> >> >> >> *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com <ddorwin@google.com>] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:33 PM >> *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> >> *Cc:* Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton < >> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; >> public-hme-editors@w3.org >> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> Jerry has landed it. The spec LGTM. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> >> I’m working on it now. >> >> >> >> *From:* Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:06 PM >> *To:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> >> *Cc:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Paul Cotton < >> Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; >> public-hme-editors@w3.org >> >> >> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 9, 2016, at 7:03 PM, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> wrote: >> >> Jerry or Mark, can you remove those four? >> >> >> >> I could remove them, but not until about 2-3 hours from now. >> >> >> >> ...Mark >> >> I'm replying to Henri in #110. I don't think it's strictly related to >> #110, so I don't consider that bocking. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> >> Perhaps remove then #192, #207, #101 and #85; plus Issue 3? >> >> >> >> That leaves #221, #219, #242 and #237 for cleanup during CR. >> >> >> >> *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:50 PM >> *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> >> *Cc:* Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret < >> plh@w3.org>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; public-hme-editors@w3.org >> >> >> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> One (ISSUE 3) does not have an issue, but I think we can remove it. >> Summary: >> >> - #192, #207, #101: We could remove all those related to VNext issues. >> - #221: I think PING members plan to review now that we've addressed >> #117, etc. >> - ISSUE 3: I'm not sure there is anything to do here. I heard the >> Second Screen CG is including this topic in their re-charter. >> - #85: Covered by the at risk statement. >> - #219, #242 and #237 seem like something we can address in CR. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> >> There are 10 issue boxes in the spec, I believe all with active issues >> behind them. I assumed they’d not be removed for CR, but perhaps later. >> >> >> >> *From:* Paul Cotton >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:38 PM >> *To:* Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; >> Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Jerry Smith (WPT) < >> jdsmith@microsoft.com> >> *Cc:* public-hme-editors@w3.org >> *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> There are two red ISSUE boxes in the EME SOTD for #192 AND #221. Can >> these be removed? Are there any others in the document? >> >> <image001.jpg> >> >> /paulc >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org <plh@w3.org>] >> Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:29 PM >> To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Matt Wolenetz < >> wolenetz@google.com>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> >> Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; >> public-hme-editors@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts >> >> >> >> One change here. Our systems [1] switched to tomorrow (June 10) already >> (?). >> >> >> >> If it is issued, the CfC for EME will now have to use >> >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/ >> >> >> >> Philippe >> >> >> >> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2016Jun/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 10 June 2016 03:44:30 UTC