RE: Generating June 9 working drafts

Are we confirming the current working drafts?  I believe each editor should separately reply with their confirmation.  I’m still reviewing, but will confirm before I leave.

Jerry

From: Matt Wolenetz [mailto:wolenetz@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 5:18 PM
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org) <plh@w3.org>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; public-hme-editors@w3.org
Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts


Jerry, please confirm here.

On Jun 9, 2016 2:28 PM, "Matt Wolenetz" <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>> wrote:
Paul, you now have my confirmation for MSE v1 in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hme-editors/2016Jun/0037.html with 2 conditions called-out.

Jerry, please review https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hme-editors/2016Jun/0037.html and confirm here if you believe the drafts are ready.

Thanks everyone!
I need to go care for a sick family member this afternoon (PDT), but will keep an eye on email around this.

Matt

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote:
I will NOT send out any CfC until I have FIRM confirmation from the Editors that the drafts are READY.

/paulc

From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 5:02 PM
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Matthew Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>> (wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>) <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>; Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>) <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>
Cc: public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Generating June 9 working drafts

FYI, I am going out to a business appointment at 5:45pm EDT this evening and will be away from my desk until approximately 9pm EDT.    I would appreciate someone in the PDT zone replying to this message before 9pm EDT (6pm PDT) giving me the current status of each of the specs.

/paulc

From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 3:19 PM
To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>
Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts

I am focused on this all day as I have been all week. I agree, I think we will be able to get the major blocking issues addressed. I think review turnaround will be the bottleneck going forward.

I have two outstanding pull requests. The first is fairly large and touches a lot of text, so we should try to land that ASAP to avoid conflicts.

  *   https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/pull/238

  *   https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/pull/235


Those two PRs address most of #117 and #231, respectively. There is some refactoring to be done to wrap up #117, but that depends on landing #238. The refactoring should be straightforward.

#110 is mostly fixed, but there is some discussion there. I doubt we will reach a conclusion on that today. #233 is essentially an IDL discussion. We could make a change, but I'm not sure we'll have confirmation on the correctness today.

Note: I believe the registry links will be broken unless we land https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/pull/213. I provided feedback. Philippe, what is your plan here?

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>> wrote:
I am available most of today to work on the remaining issues. I expect we can get them done. But since no time zone was attached to the June 9 deadline, it might be best for Phillipe to expect to produce the working drafts tomorrow.

...Mark

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Can you please give us an update on when the remaining EME V1 issues will be closed?  Can you get them ALL done today as planned?

/paulc

-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 2:40 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>
Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts

I'm testing around #91.

http://jay.w3.org/~plehegar/trackdefault.html

http://jay.w3.org/~plehegar/trackdefaultlist.html


As far as I can tell, only Chrome implements this part. I tried on Edge and Firefox and it doesn't seem to work at all.

Is that correct?

Philippe

On 06/09/2016 02:13 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) wrote:
> Just commented on #91.  The kinds sequence needs to be accessed from
> within an algorithm.  Is that simple to do?  If so, this doesn’t look hard.
>
> Jerry
>
> *From:*Matt Wolenetz [mailto:wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:12 AM
> *To:* Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>
> *Cc:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Jerry Smith (WPT)
> <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>)
> <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>;
> public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts
>
> #5 is fixed, so MSE v1 only has #91 remaining.
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>
> <mailto:wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>> wrote:
>
>     Both of the MSE issues are pending action from other editors:
>
>     #5 has a PR pending review.
>     #91 needs input. Philippe, can you help on that one, since it's
>     related to a problem with webidl and the recent sequence type change
>     in MSE?
>
>     Matt
>
>     On Jun 9, 2016 8:10 AM, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
>     <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>> wrote:
>
>         EME V1 issues (6 including ISSUE-85):
>
>         https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues?milestone=1

>
>         MSE V1 issues (2):
>
>         https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues?milestone=2

>
>         Philippe is ready to generate the June 9 MSE and EME working
>         drafts that will be referenced in the WG CfC’s to publish them
>         as Candidate Recommendations.
>
>         When will the Editors be done with V1 issues?
>
>         /paulc
>
>         Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>
>         17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>
>         Tel: (425) 705-9596<tel:%28425%29%20705-9596> <tel:%28425%29%20705-9596> Fax: (425)
>         936-7329 <tel:%28425%29%20936-7329>
>