- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:53:54 -0400
- To: Vipul Kashyap <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Cc: "Andersson, Bo H" <Bo.H.Andersson@astrazeneca.com>, Landen Bain <lbain@topsailtech.com>, Rachel Richesson <Rachel.Richesson@epi.usf.edu>, public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, public-hcls-dse@w3.org, Stanley Huff <Stan.Huff@intermountainmail.org>, Yan Heras <Yan.Heras@intermountainmail.org>, "Oniki, Tom (GE Healthcare, consultant)" <Tom.Oniki@ge.com>, Joey Coyle <joey@xcoyle.com>, "Bron W. Kisler" <bkisler@earthlink.net>, Ida Sim <sim@medicine.ucsf.edu>
Something that I remain confused about is why there are two categories of criteria, when, on the face of it, the negation of an exclusion criterion is an inclusion criterion. So I'm wondering, is there something between the lines? Is there something other than the negation? Perhaps kind of criteria, or lesser necessity, or derivation from different sources? Open versus closed world? Otherwise, from a technical point of view can we just consider these the the same sort of thing, with a flag indicating how they should be shown in a hypothetical user interface? -Alan
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 16:54:21 UTC