- From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:23:42 -0500
- To: "Forsberg, Kerstin L" <Kerstin.L.Forsberg@astrazeneca.com>, "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-hcls-dse@w3.org>, "Stanley Huff" <Stan.Huff@intermountainmail.org>, "Oniki, Tom (GE Healthcare, consultant)" <Tom.Oniki@ge.com>, "Jonathan Rees" <jar@creativecommons.org>
> What concerns me is the way CDISC pick terms from many different > concepts structures in NCIt, combine them into controlled terminologies, > and use them as strings (submission values) in the Topic fields in > SDTM records. > (see http://www.w3.org/2007/11/NCIt_and_CDISC_CT.ppt) [VK] I think you raise a very important issue. Clearly in some cases this "combination" might really be nonsensical. The issue in front of us as a group is: (a) Do we continue or analysis by treating these "mixtures" to be true and worry about them only if we can see that they are creating wrong results? (b) Is there something we can specify in this combination of concept structures into "string values" in our interoperability mappings? Will this help us in any way? Kerstin, I was wondering if we could make a list of these kinds of issues and incorporate it in the functional requirements table? Let me know what you think. > In your article about record/statement/domain level, > http://owl-workshop.man.ac.uk/acceptedLong/submission_26.pdf, > I think you call to this as the "database / record attitude". [VK] Maybe Alan can explain this better. One way of looking at this could be is that some one defined a mapping/transformation from a concept in the NCIT to a string value in a database record. The challenge in the above is that at best one can do "string matching" type of things as all the semantics of the concepts are lost by the time they are stored as "strings" in the CDISC database record. For meaningful automated inference we would probably need to go back to the original conceptual representation? I think these are important issues and look forward to discussing them at today's Telcon. Please e-mail us other such concerns and questions you have. Thanks and Regards, ---Vipul The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 14:24:02 UTC