- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:30:24 -0500
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: swick <swick@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
This GRDDL WG finished its job a while ago, but to stay on the safe side of some open patent policy issues*, W3C didn't formally close this WG. It has since become more clear that the issue doesn't affect the GRDDL WG, so this WG can be closed any time now. Does it matter to anybody when we close this WG? Do you have an upcoming birthday or anything, Harry? ;-) If we close this WG, the comments list stays open, but there's no way to come up with an answer that's officially on behalf of the WG. If we don't close the WG, I suppose Harry can call a meeting any time, given a week's notice, and we could conduct WG business; e.g. collective action re HTML 5 head/@profile. That might re-raise the question of availability of W3C staff resources for the WG, too. I've given it a little thought and I suppose I'm content to close the WG and leave GRDDL's fate in the hands of the community as a whole, as I said in... The details of data in documents; GRDDL, profiles, and HTML5 2008-08-22 http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/08/the_details_of_data_in_documen.html http://dig.csail.mit.edu/breadcrumbs/node/240 * http://www.w3.org/2003/12/22-pp-faq.html#superset -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 5 September 2008 16:30:38 UTC