- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:52:55 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
No problem. Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Dan Connolly wrote: >> Jeremy Carroll wrote: >>> >>> >>> I don't see a reply to: >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007JulSep/0000.html >> >> >> >> It's a comment on the primer, so it wasn't critical path to REC, >> but yes, it's still outstanding. >> > > Hmmm, I've just looked at every instance of the word HTML or html in > the primer. I don't think there is much room for real confusion. > > All the early uses are followed by examples that have a declaration of > being XHTML. The later examples all have an xmlns decl for xhtml. > > I would encourage an editor to reply to the commentator asking for > where this potential confusion actually arises. > > Jeremy > > > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:53:15 UTC