- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:45:48 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > Jeremy Carroll wrote: >> >> >> I don't see a reply to: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007JulSep/0000.html > > > It's a comment on the primer, so it wasn't critical path to REC, > but yes, it's still outstanding. > Hmmm, I've just looked at every instance of the word HTML or html in the primer. I don't think there is much room for real confusion. All the early uses are followed by examples that have a declaration of being XHTML. The later examples all have an xmlns decl for xhtml. I would encourage an editor to reply to the commentator asking for where this potential confusion actually arises. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:46:57 UTC