Re: GRDDL WG Agenda March 21st 11:00 EST

Harry Halpin wrote:

>     5. Use-Case Document: Going To Last Call?
>           + ACTION: Jeremy [DONE] to [12]review Use-case document
>           + Vote for publication of usecases/scenario-gallery

Please note that I and Fabien are advocating going directly to WG Note. 
No last call is needed. Should any issues be raised on the comments list 
after publication which we would like to address we can always republish 
a WG Note. The status WG Note indicates that we do not plan to make any 
changes.


>     6. Test Cases as Rec?
>           + ACTION: Chime adding sentence to Test Case Doc specifying
>             that local security policy must be set to none before
>             running tests
That's done

>     7. Library
>           + See [15]page Jeremy completed. [16]Linked but not
>             [17]integrated into test-suite as tests.
>           + ACTION: HarryH to make sure library transforms are linked
>             from Primer.
>     8. Test-Cases nominated for approval
>           + ACTION: Chime to take pending tests for approval from
>             agenda and see if at least 2 implementations pass them.
>           + ACTION: Danja [DONE] sketch the "no, namespace document
>             triples aren't part of grddl results" test in [18]e-mail
>             and ask bwm to check it. Needs checking in and adding to
>             test-suite
>           + ACTION: bwm [DONE] to produce [19]a test case with GRDDL
>             transforms on two different representations (HTML and SVG)
>             of the same information resource Needs checking in and
>             adding to test-suite

I think we should also discuss the alternative tests issue.
I will send an e-mail shortly identifying what I think are the issues.

I will first sketch a third solution to this problem.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 12:13:23 UTC