- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 06:40:42 -0600
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:12 -0500, Murray Maloney wrote: > Here are my collected comments on the GRDDL WD > > Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of Languages (GRDDL) > editor's draft $Date: 2007/02/21 16:25:45 $ > $Revision: 1.228 $ http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec > I think that only one of my comments is substantial and it is identified in > HTTP Headers. > > I have taken the liberty to edit Jeremy's Security section. Feel free to > ignore my edits. > In particular, I tried to reduce the use of "should" phrases and substitute > "are advised" phrases. > I did this on the basis that one man's security risk is another man's > design feature. The HTTP headers edit is overcome by events. Murray applied his edits and sent me the result (for reference: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:49:29 -0500) I reviewed them and checked them in as follows... Revision 1.229 2007/03/01 12:37:41 connolly - security section wordsmithing by Murray (following comments of Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:12:09 -0500) but retaining "off-the-shelf" as per jjc (in a messge that I can't seem to find now) -- s/transform/transformation/ - in GRDDL-Aware Agents section: -- add missing comma -- replace unclear 'steps 4 and 5' with 'discovery by...' - wordsmith 'no clear mechanism' para in intro - in protocol trace section: s/appendix/example/ - 'identifiable' spelling fix -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2007 13:45:52 UTC