- From: Clark, John <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:11:37 -0400
- To: "public-grddl-wg" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
> > Is it a good idea to explicitly note the sources like this? > The idea > > was that it should work on different sets of RDF data (that > the user > > would provide to the query (e.g. "on the command line")). > Hmmm...I would guess most "new" users would use a SPARQL > online service and cut and paste examples. That was myself > and Jeremy's logic in using explicit noting of sources. Ah, good point. I hadn't looked at the online SPARQL services; I find it interesting that they don't let you provide input graphs manually. In any case, I think that's a very good reason. I didn't change the text of the inline SPARQL query to include the source references; do you want me to go ahead and do that, or to leave it "generic"? Take care, John L. Clark =================================== Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of our services, staff and locations. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 18:11:57 UTC