- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:22:42 -0500
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
I suggest the following response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0078.html --8<-- Thanks for the careful review and comments/suggestions. The Working Group has discussed ambiguity in reading XML documents, and come to a conclusion that we should not completely address it in a GRDDL standard at this time: RESOLUTION: whereas TAG issue xmlFunctions-34 is still open and the XProc WG is still working on its "default processing" task, noting tests #xinclude and #noxinclude and the health-warning about default attributes, XInclude etc. in section 6 GRDDL Transformations, to postpone issue #faithful-infoset -- minutes 6 June 2007 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/att-0046/SV_MEETING_TITLE_--_6_Jun_2007.htm#item04 <- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/issues#issue-faithful-infoset We look forward to further work in this area by the XProc Working Group, the TAG and other parts of the community. We hope you find this response satisfactory. Please let us know whether you do. --8<-- -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 17:22:46 UTC