- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:06:40 -0400
- To: <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Cc: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
> From: Chimezie Ogbuji [mailto:ogbujic@ccf.org] > [ . . . ] > So, GRDDL would be defining a specific, fine-grained parsing mechanism > independent of the *inevitable* development of a general-purpose XML > Processing Model which answers the question (among others) of > "What will the impact of a default processing model be on > existing XML documents and processors,...?" -- > http://www.w3.org/2005/10/xml-processing-model-wg-charter.html > #xml-scope Yes, because that doesn't exist yet. If we wish to instead defer to that future definition of an XProc default processing model, that is the explicit intent of the compromise proposal, #3c: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/0333.html David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 16:07:01 UTC