- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:00:13 -0400
- To: <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Cc: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
> From: Chimezie Ogbuji [mailto:ogbujic@ccf.org] > [ . . . ] > How can this be independent of #issue-faithful-infoset (which has been > closed, re-opened, closed, and postponed - taking XProc's charter into > account)? It isn't. Since #issue-faithful-infoset is currently postponed rather than closed, this proposal would represent a change to the WG's default position on that issue, in the absence of being able to actually close it. > [ . . . ] > Would the notion of minimum processing not need to be defined very > explicitly (in the absence of any current definition)? Not sure. I ran the idea by one implementer, and he didn't raise any immediate flags, but that isn't much of a sample size. Do you think it needs to be further defined? If so, how? The informative text can also provide further explanation. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 16:00:28 UTC