- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:58:02 -0500
- To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 14:03 -0400, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: > > -- http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.272 > Please *do* mention TAG issue xmlFunctions-34 in the body, because that > makes it much clearer to the reader what questions we are hoping the > resolution of that TAG issue will provide "clarification and guidance" > about. I think it is far more important to be clear than to avoid > mentioning it just for the sake of not looking odd. I thought about this some more, and I still think that what the WG hopes belongs in the status section, not the body of the spec. I think the test cases make this more clear than any text in the prose of the spec could do. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 22:58:06 UTC