Re: misc editorial questions/issues on spec

On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:53 -0400, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
wrote:
> [...] I suggest clarifying this
> by changing the following earlier sentence:
> [[
> For example, this XML document is linked to two GRDDL transformations:
> ]]
> to:
> [[
> For example, this XML document, located at
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/titleauthor.html , is linked to
> two GRDDL transformations:
> ]]

Done in 1.274.


> ---------------
> 
> Q12: [Minor Editorial] Sec 5: "metadata profile name" should be bold in
> normative text:
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#rule_profiletrans
> Also "with root node NODE" should be "with XPath rood node NODE".

done in 1.275


> Q13: [Minor Editorial] Sec 5 title should be "GRDDL for XHTML Profiles",
> since it only addresses XHTML -- not HTML in general.

Maybe; but the concept of a profile comes from the HTML 4.01 spec;
the XHTML spec doesn't actually explain it; it imports from HTML 4.01.

So I'm inclined to leave this as is.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 22:54:40 UTC