- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:36:10 -0500
- To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:53 -0400, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: > Below are the additional editorial questions/issues that I noticed and > promised to send. > > ------------ > > Q1a: Missing MUST, SHOULD or MAY for RDF/XML output format. > The spec does not make clear whether transformation results MUST, SHOULD > or MAY be obtainable in RDF/XML That's an aspect of the design that was decided by the WG, not delegated to the editor. The WG decided #issue-whichlangs on 6 Dec, and then on 25 April decided that the then-current text address all outstanding issues, including that one. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/issues#issue-output-formats http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/att-0212/2007_04_25-grddl-minutes.html#item05 So this isn't something I (as editor) can do without the WG reconsidering the issue. More on the other questions separately. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 22:36:16 UTC