- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 04:50:46 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > concerning: > > Dave Beckett wrote: > >> >> >> Maybe you can remove or separate out informative tests from the >> full list? Failure is an option. >> > > > Would it be possible to provide two manifests for the test doc: > > a) the normative tests > > b) the informative tests > > in addition to a GRDDL result that is all the tests? > > I guess this could be done by: > - having the informative tests in a list with class="InformativeTestList" > - provide a parameter to the aboutTests stylesheet that controls > which classes are matched: default both, but optional just "TestList" > or just "InformativeTestList" Clear separation of the "informative" versus "normative" tests was one of the things that was requested us in our CR request, so we should obviously address this before we go to PR Request. So, I don't think this option requires a WG decision, I would just go and do it (i.e. separate informative and normative in the tests). > > > Jeremy > > > > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 08:50:56 UTC