- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:33:36 +0100
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Hi Dave, concerning: Dave Beckett wrote: > 2) error1 > This is a new test since I last ran the tests > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests#error1 > which I also fail but I noticed it is informative. > > > Tests that check error handling seems to be a problem as I do not see > it efined in the GRDDL spec; what happens when an error occurs in > URI retrieval, XSLT, XInclude, RDF/XML parsing or some other step. > > Maybe you can remove or separate out informative tests from the > full list? Failure is an option. > Would it be possible to provide two manifests for the test doc: a) the normative tests b) the informative tests in addition to a GRDDL result that is all the tests? I guess this could be done by: - having the informative tests in a list with class="InformativeTestList" - provide a parameter to the aboutTests stylesheet that controls which classes are matched: default both, but optional just "TestList" or just "InformativeTestList" Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 08:33:54 UTC