Re: Review of "Base URIs and GRDDL"

Clark, John wrote:
>> Summary, all suggestions accepted except for the suggestion 
>> to excise this sentence:
>> [[
>> In many applications of GRDDL, the possibility of GRDDL 
>> results that depend on the application default URI is highly 
>> undesirable; GRDDL aware agents may choose to treat this case 
>> as an error.
>> ]]
>> Given the excision of its context, I think maybe changing it to:
>> [[
>> In many applications of GRDDL, the possibility of GRDDL 
>> results that depend on an application default URI, from 
>> section 5.1.4 of RFC 3986, is highly undesirable; some GRDDL 
>> aware agents may treat this case as an error.
>> ]]
>> is that agreeable?
> 
> Yes, and good catch.  I admit that I had glossed over that sentence as
> it seemed part of a sequence of points that had already been covered.  I
> think the phrasing "the possibility of GRDDL results that depend on an
> application default URI ... is highly undesirable" is a bit awkward, but
> most of the alternatives that I can think of also seem awkward.  Perhaps
> insert the word "producing" before "GRDDL results"?

Passivize:
In many applications, it is highly undesirable
that GRDDL results may depend on an application default URI,
from section 5.1.4 of RFC 3986, ; some GRDDL
aware agents may treat this possibility as an error.

J

> 
> Take care,
> 
>     John L. Clark
> 
> ===================================
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in
> America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at
> http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of
> our services, staff and locations.
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this communication in error,  please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 20:52:32 UTC