- From: Clark, John <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:40:34 -0400
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
> Summary, all suggestions accepted except for the suggestion
> to excise this sentence:
> [[
> In many applications of GRDDL, the possibility of GRDDL
> results that depend on the application default URI is highly
> undesirable; GRDDL aware agents may choose to treat this case
> as an error.
> ]]
> Given the excision of its context, I think maybe changing it to:
> [[
> In many applications of GRDDL, the possibility of GRDDL
> results that depend on an application default URI, from
> section 5.1.4 of RFC 3986, is highly undesirable; some GRDDL
> aware agents may treat this case as an error.
> ]]
> is that agreeable?
Yes, and good catch. I admit that I had glossed over that sentence as
it seemed part of a sequence of points that had already been covered. I
think the phrasing "the possibility of GRDDL results that depend on an
application default URI ... is highly undesirable" is a bit awkward, but
most of the alternatives that I can think of also seem awkward. Perhaps
insert the word "producing" before "GRDDL results"?
Take care,
John L. Clark
===================================
Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in
America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at
http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of
our services, staff and locations.
Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 20:40:50 UTC