- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:44:58 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 12:04 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> This all looks OK...
Oops; when thinking thru David's proposal to make
transformation properties take documents rather
than XPath Nodesets, I realized this bit of
the namespace document is bogus:
dataview:TransformationProperty a :Class;
:comment """a FunctionalProperty that relates
XML document root nodes to
RDF graphs""";
:domain dataview:RootNode;
:label "TransformationProperty";
:range dataview:RDFGraph;
:subClassOf owl:FunctionalProperty .
It's not the class that has that domain, but every
member of the class.
I think that can be said with OWL-Full restrictions
on domain/range; I'm not sure whether it's worthwhile.
Hmm....
For now, I'm adding a TODO to 1.265 of
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddlvocab
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 15:45:11 UTC