- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 10:16:32 +0100
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
I've updated the comments disposition page: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/lc-spec There is rather more that isn't completely closed than I had indicated (8 comments in total). Six of these need attention before PR, and so need telecon time tomorrow, if we are to have a PR vote next week. Fully open substantive: (Booth) ======================= http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0078 DBooth3 (see below) Fully open editorial: (Booth) ===================== http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0052 Dan has the ball on this one. Procedurally open: 1 comment (Beckett) ================== http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0102 Beckett's Raptor's test report. As far as I can see, the WG responses were satisfactory, but we should check with Dave. I would do so, but I think it might be better to OK the editor's draft and ask him for another EARL report, since we've changed some tests. Pending edits to completely close: 3 comments (Booth) ================================== Two comments are addressed with the Base appendix, which is in the hands of John and Dan I believe. (Both Booths comments 9a and 9c). http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0074 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0069 One comment has been promised text in the primer: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0072 Awaiting response: 2 comments (King and XSLT/XQuery WG) ================== (no change) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0053 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0030 +++++++++++++++++++++ On DBooth3 I think we now have a possible change on the table. I hope at the telecon, we can agree whether or not we will make this change, and then agree to formally address the comment along the lines of: -------------- Dear David, thank you for your comment. We have made the following changes: - changed the word 'implementation-defined' to 'unspecified' concerning, for example, XInclude processing. - ?? any other changes agreed tomorrow ?? Are you satisfied with this response? ------------- -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 09:16:47 UTC