Re: primer review - part 1

Oops

here is an error in the text:
[[
A diagram indicating the sequence of steps described for obtaining RDF 
from a document using an explicit link to the transformation as 
described in the preceding paragraph.
]]

I think the minimum is to delete this text.
An alternative is to replace the text with a diagram.

Jeremy

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> review of
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html
> $Id: primer.html,v 1.71 2007/05/06 04:46:50 hhalpin Exp $
> 
> automated review of examples to follow.
> 
> I am reviewing with an expectation of imminent publication is WG note.
> 
> The only critical edit I am aware of is the text promised to David Booth 
> under:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0075.html 
> 
> 
> In addition the SOTD and livery would need to be updated.
> 
> 
> 
> I had two non-critical comments:
> 
> - sometimes in the examples the transformation is given by a relative 
> reference. If an absolute reference were given then the text code be 
> copy-pasted. I suspect an absolute reference into the final location of 
> the primer would be best. I leave it to the editors' discretion as to a) 
> is this desirable and b) is it sufficiently desirable to be worth the work.
> 
> 
> - the name "Embedded RDF" confused me, because I was more familiar with 
> the library transformation with the same name, that does something 
> totally different. No suggested change, but I will e-mail group about this.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 17:24:17 UTC