- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:24:51 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org
This looks great. Jeremy Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 09:49 -0400, Clark, John wrote: >> ... Here's the text for that >> approach: > ... >> <th>Normative Statement</th> >> </tr> >> >> <tr> >> >> <td class="assertion"> >> <p>If a representation of an information resource has media type >> "application/rdf+xml" or is an XML document such that the XPath >> expression >> >> <pre>/*[local-name()="RDF" and >> namespace-uri()="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"]</pre> >> >> returns a node-set with a single node, then it is a conforming RDF/XML >> document.</p> >> </td> > > Hmm... it seems a bit scary to come right out and normatively > say what's an RDF/XML document anywhere besides the RDF/XML spec. > > Also, I reviewed issue-mt-ns and found that we'd have > to re-open the issue to add a rule, since > our 2007-02-07 decision was that "the current rules address > issue-mt-ns". > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-mt-ns > > So rather than add any normative rule boxes, I just > added this paragraph after the existing rule, citing* > a test case that we recently approved: > > [[ > Note that while an application/rdf+xml media type is one indication that > a document is RDF/XML, section 7.2.1 Grammar start of [RDFX] leaves open > "other means" by which an RDF/XML document may be identified. For the > purposes of the rule above, root element whose local name is RDF and > whose namespace URI is http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# is > such a means. For a case in point, see the grddlonrdf-xmlmediatype test > case. > ]] > -- http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec v1.252 > > > * v1.252 cites GRDDL test cases normatively > > -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 09:25:12 UTC