- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:57:49 +0100
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
If we are trying just to honour what other standards do, then I think we should be assuming that any use of xml:base in a document is valid (i.e. permitted by the document format and consistent with XML Base Rec) The only place where we may know that this is false is in an XHTML doc, where xml:base is not permitted. So, a test case, would be with an XML doc in some dialect that a) permits xml:base b) ideally permits grddl:transformation both on the root element The specified transform would be with a relative reference, and, using the two directory trick, we can see which ran. Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 14:58:09 UTC