- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:57:02 -0500
- To: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 15:10 -0400, Clark, John wrote: > At last meeting's telecon, we discussed how to deal with XML documents > that might parse as RDF/XML documents[0]. At that time, I took an > action to draft some text to try to address our decision[1]. My first > pass at this text follows. This text is intended to follow the table > containing the last normative statement of section 3 in the GRDDL > editor's draft version 1.249[2]. > [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#ns-bind Thanks; it looks pretty close. I got as far as adding a TODO in 1.250. One bit that doesn't look quite right... > The text does contain a normative > statement, but no mechanical rule. > > <text status="suggestion"> > <p><a > href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/#section > -grammar-productions">Identifying a conforming RDF/XML document is > optionally left up the system interacting with such a document</a><a > href="#RDFX">[RDFX]</a>. A GRDDL-aware agent needs to be able to > determine when generic XML documents should be treated as RDF/XML in > order to apply the previous rule. As a result, it has an expanded > awareness of RDF/XML documents that includes most XML documents that > have a root element of <code><rdf:RDF > xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"/>;</code>. > Specifically:</p> > > <table border="1"> > <tr> > <th>Normative Statement</th> > </tr> > > <tr> > > <td class="assertion"> > <p>If an information resource has media type "application/rdf+xml" or is > an XML document that follows <a > href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/#doc">pr > oduction doc</a> from <cite>RDF/XML Syntax Specification</cite><a > href="#RDFX">[RDFX]</a>, then within the context of this specification > it is a conforming RDF/XML document.</p> > </td> That talks about an information resource being a conforming RDF/XML document; I think it's the representation that we're worried about, in this case. > </tr> > </table> > </text> > > [0] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/att-0068/11- > grddl-wg-minutes.html#item05 > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/att-0068/11- > grddl-wg-minutes.html#action09 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2007 14:57:28 UTC