- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 21:51:26 -0400
- To: John Madden <john.madden@duke.edu>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
John, There was some concern from Chime that the sort of "saving patient life" use-case might bit a bit unwise from a medical standpoint. Chime suggested, can we discover if we have an "X-ray indication" attached to the HL7 information model: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Mar/0126.html However, I don't know if that's compelling enough as an example. Anyways, would like to address this XML/OWL example in Primer, and keep it short, simple, and catchy. -harry John Madden wrote: > > Harry, > > Yes, I am putting suggested revisions to this use case together now > and will post this weekend together with comments. > > John > > > > On Apr 4, 2007, at 1:48 AM, Harry Halpin wrote: > >> John (cc'ing the GRDDL WG list), >> >> As per our last conversation, I was hoping if you can help us with the >> "killer" GRDDL use-case you were talking about earlier. In particular, >> the use-case I believe has a patient going to the doctor twice, and so >> filling out two different HL7 CDA documents, both in XML. On his first >> visit, he records that he is allergic to a particular family of drugs. >> On the second visit, he forgets that he is allergic to this family of >> drugs, and so his second HL7 CDA document does not record this. A doctor >> prescribes him a drug on the second visit, unknowingly a drug that is a >> subclass of the family of drugs the patient is allergic to by virtue of >> its properties. >> >> Yet the hospital can automatically catch this error and save the >> patient's life by converting both HL7 documents via GRDDL to RDF, and >> merging them. Therefore the old data about the patient being allergic is >> not lost, but discovered. >> >> Furthermore, because the family of drugs is kept in an ontology, some >> sort of simple OWL entailment can show the drug the doctor prescribed is >> a subclass of the drug the patient said they were allergic to. >> >> John - this piece would be a rewrite of piece of the Primer Chime >> already wrote. I'm happy to write the prose if you can produce another >> HL7 document that describes this sort of use-case, and feel free to >> modify anything , including data files, (all files are linked from the >> primer): >> >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc29/primer.html#hl7 >> >> >> >> -- -harry >> >> Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh >> http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426 >> > > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2007 01:51:30 UTC