Re: Draft for GRDDL WG Weekly - 13th of September

On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 16:53 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> Attached - hopefully Pine gets the content-type right this time.

Well, no; at least: not good enough for our archive software;
It's text/plain:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Sep/att-0110/13-grddl-wg-minutes.html

So I'm attaching it again.

Also, I'd like to reconsider the decision to accept

http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/homepage/notes/Sep06-grddl-wg-minutes.htm
as a true record; I think it's worth keeping all official
meeting records in the w3.org domain, so in this copy
of the 13 Sep minutes, I use
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Sep/att-0077/Sep06-grddl-wg-minutes.htm
as the URI of the 6 Sep minutes.

The bytes aren't exactly the same, but `diff -bwu` shows no differences.



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E