- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:32:12 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:14 +0100, Ian Davis wrote: >> On 05/09/2006 15:01, Dan Connolly wrote: >>> The spec currently doesn't define "GRDDL-aware client" or any such >>> class of software. It just tells you what RDF data is part of the >>> meaning of a document. It seems self-evident, to me, that any client >>> may ignore any part of the data in a document. >> >> I'm not sure it's self evident to many who may read the document. Given >> that at least one other member of this group's view is contradictory[1] >> then we ought to clarify. I'm currently rewording / expanding the conformance label suggestions with this (and Dan's concerns) in mind. > > I can't think of any way to clarify. Anybody who thinks it's important > to clarify will please suggest some text. Chimezie Ogbuji Lead Systems Analyst Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 Cleveland, Ohio 44195 Office: (216)444-8593 ogbujic@ccf.org > >> Ian >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/mid/Pine.GSO.4.60.0609050903590.15384@joplin.bio.ri.ccf.or > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 14:32:51 UTC