- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:29:36 +0200
- To: "Ian Davis" <ian.davis@talis.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
On 9/5/06, Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com> wrote: > > In > > http://www.w3.org/2003/g/glean-profile > > I see the following documentation: > > "This transformation produces a list of GRDDL profile transformers from > XHTML. It implements the mechanism (@@@not yet) described in the GRDDL > spec, where each link ( link or a ) with a rel attribute set to > profileTransformation is used to identify a transformer associated to > the profile identified by the URI of the given document. Wording could probably be improved, but seems ok so far. But - It also allows > to describe profiles identified by fragments of the URI of the given > document, in an elements with a class attribute set to subProfile, > containing a link to the said fragment with a rel attribute set to > profile, and another link with a profileTransformation rel as described > above." Would I be right in thinking the intention here is to specify different transformations for different sections of the doc? That seems quite a complicated addition (may just be the wording) for little gain - does it even add anything, given that the frags can be handled separately by the XSLT? > We need to define this subProfile concept in the spec or we should > revise this stylesheet. Yes. Is there an example anywhere demonstrating the utility of subProfile? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 September 2006 09:29:44 UTC