W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: hope to hear from you today about the GRDDL spec

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:38:59 -0400
Message-ID: <453917C3.2030206@adida.net>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> I think you missed a subtlety.
> Any GRDDL result of ?NSDOC is a result of ?D by the 1st bullet.

So this means that you can declare a namespaceTransformation in the
instance document? I guess that doesn't hurt, but it's fairly confusing.
I'm not sure what the value of this generalized formalization is.

>> - 1. > GRDDL Primer
>> This subsection seems a bit terse.
> I'm not inspired with anything better just now.
>> - 3. > last diagram
>> This diagram doesn't show the timing of things, which could be
>> confusing. I suggest adding numbers that show the sequence: 1) NSDOC is
>> transformed, yielding a namespaceTransformation, 2) D is transformed,
>> using namespaceTransformation.
> Yes, the diagram needs work. I'm not sure if I'm going to get
> to it for this round. I lean toward keeping the diagram in
> for this round even if I can't fix it, though.

That's fine.

Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 18:39:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:34 UTC