- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:38:59 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > I think you missed a subtlety. > Any GRDDL result of ?NSDOC is a result of ?D by the 1st bullet. So this means that you can declare a namespaceTransformation in the instance document? I guess that doesn't hurt, but it's fairly confusing. I'm not sure what the value of this generalized formalization is. >> - 1. > GRDDL Primer >> This subsection seems a bit terse. > > I'm not inspired with anything better just now. > > >> - 3. > last diagram >> This diagram doesn't show the timing of things, which could be >> confusing. I suggest adding numbers that show the sequence: 1) NSDOC is >> transformed, yielding a namespaceTransformation, 2) D is transformed, >> using namespaceTransformation. > > Yes, the diagram needs work. I'm not sure if I'm going to get > to it for this round. I lean toward keeping the diagram in > for this round even if I can't fix it, though. That's fine. -Ben
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 18:39:16 UTC