Re: section 2. Adding GRDDL to well-formed XML for review

On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 12:43 -0400, Murray Maloney wrote:
> Dan,
> 
> The definitions should probably be in reverse order.
> Just in terms of the importance of each defnition.

Yes, I came to the same conclusion while working on
other edits, I think. Stay tuned for details...


> At 11:18 AM 10/17/2006 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddl-xml
> > Revision 1.106  2006/10/17 16:06:56 

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 18:40:00 UTC