- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:43:23 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 16:43:34 UTC
Dan, The definitions should probably be in reverse order. Just in terms of the importance of each defnition. At 11:18 AM 10/17/2006 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >Section 2 is now called "Adding GRDDL to well-formed XML". > >http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddl-xml >Revision 1.106 2006/10/17 16:06:56 > >I ended up defining "GRDDL result" formally and using >"source document". > >Also, regarding... > > TODO: explain why not <?xml-stylesheet ?> > >Murray says: No explanation is needed. This is a design decision >that is in keeping with Web Architecture. PIs are deprecated. > >That works for me, so I took the TODO out. > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 16:43:34 UTC