- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:31:49 -0500
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 13:17 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Murray Maloney wrote: [...] > "So why not <?xml-stylesheet ?> and how are GRDDL transforms different from transforms identified this way". > > I don't think a paragraph explaining the following points is too much to > ask to explain the need for a significant departure from the ?xml-stylesheet precedent: The TODO has been there for a while and neither I nor anybody else has come up with any suggested text. Murray suggested taking it out, and that works for me, so I did. If you suggest something in its place, I'll happily consider it. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 17:32:09 UTC