W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: section 2. Adding GRDDL to well-formed XML for review

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:31:49 -0500
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161106310.4240.11.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 13:17 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Murray Maloney wrote:
> "So why not <?xml-stylesheet ?> and how are GRDDL transforms different from transforms identified this way".
> I don't think a paragraph explaining the following points is too much to 
> ask to explain the need for a significant departure from the ?xml-stylesheet precedent:

The TODO has been there for a while and neither I nor anybody else has
come up with any suggested text. Murray suggested taking it out,
and that works for me, so I did. If you suggest something in its
place, I'll happily consider it.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 17:32:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:33 UTC