- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:10:40 -0800
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Everything in https://sommer.dev.java.net is under a BSD licence. Do you need more? If so I am sure there will be no problem, but I'll just ask confirmation (certainly to be granted) - we have not just opened sourced all our software stack at Sun just to be tight on a few xslt transforms :-) Henry On 28 Nov 2006, at 16:28, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:12 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: >> On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 12:39 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote: >>> Pursuant to my action [1] towards - >>> >>> [#issue-output-formats] whether GRDDL transformations may produce >>> RDF >>> in a format other than RDF/XML >>> >>> I've put an (incomplete) XSLT 1.0 stylesheet at [2], along with a >>> sample Atom document [3] which works with it. >> >> I started building a test case first thing Monday morning; >> unfortunately, I tripped w3.org's abuse detector and got >> locked out. > > I think I just got it to pass. > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1#atomttl1 > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/atom-grddl.xml > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/atom2turtle_xslt-1.0.xsl > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/atom-grddl-output.rdf > > Note that the test materials give the output graph in RDF/XML; > it's the GRDDL implementation that understands how to get a graph > out of a transformation that produces turtle. The test harness > expects the GRDDL implementation to write an RDF/XML version of > the graph, which GRDDL.py is happy to do. Then the test harness > parses the expected RDF/XML and the actual RDF/XML and compares > the graphs. > > I *think* it's working... yes; if I tweak the expected results, > the test harness detects the difference. It seems to be really > working. > > Danny, Henry, I infer that you're granting W3C license > to copy these materials into our test suite. I think the WG > participation agreement might imply that you grant joint, > non-exclusive copyright to W3C. I'd have to double-check to be sure; > do you care? > > I should update the test manifest to be explicit > about the copyright/license stuff... > >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/11/22-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08 >>> [2] https://sommer.dev.java.net/atom/2006-06-06/transform/ >>> atom2turtle_xslt-1.0.xsl >>> [3] https://sommer.dev.java.net/atom/2006-06-06/transform/atom- >>> grddl.xml >>> [4] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2006 15:11:44 UTC