- From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:04:43 -0000
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Murray Maloney" <murray@muzmo.com>, "public-grddl-wg" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
[...]
> That avoids some issues, but in this example, there are
> separate transformations, glean_title.xsl and getAuthor.xsl .
> If we don't use a URI for the work, I can't see a way to get
> the two transformations to give properties of the same work.
Ah, I'd missed that. We could identify the b-node:
[[
<rdf:Description>
<dc:title>The Stand</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Stephen King</dc:creator>
<foaf:maker>
<foaf:Person>
<foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
rdf:resource="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_King" />
</foaf:Person>
</foaf:maker>
<dc:format>Book</dc:format>
<foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
rdf:resource="http://www.stephenking.com/pages/works/stand/" />
</rdf:Description>
]]
But that requires knowing that foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf is inverse
functional (which it is) and applying the inferencing. Do we want to do
that? If not, then we need to have the publisher introduce a URI for
the work - it just has to be a different URI to the source document.
>
> > Dan may disagree with the claim that
> >
> > http://www.stephenking.com/pages/works/stand/
> >
> > Does not identify the novel.
>
> Indeed, I do. Earlier, you wrote:
>
> > This web page has
> > considerably fewer words than a novel.
>
> But consider http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/ ;
> resource that has a representation that has considerably
> fewer words than the whole HTML 4 specification, and yet it
> is a URI for the HTML 4 specification.
Well, that one was food for thought. I won't bore you with the details
of where that one took me. My conclusion is that whether or not the
example is ok is a social not a technical question.
Given that the URL http://www.stephenking.com/pages/works/stand/
identifies the work titled "The Stand" written by Steven King, which of
the following do we think it ok to return as the result of a GET on that
URL:
1. A rendition of Eskimo Nell
2. A page describing the work
3. A redirect to a page describing the work
4. A page containing the text of the novel
If 1 or 2 is acceptable, then the example is fine as is. Note, if we
feel that 1 or 2 is acceptable, this implies that:
<http://www.stephenking.com/pages/works/stand/> dc:title ?foo
Does not entail
HttpGet(<http://www.stephenking.com/pages/works/stand/>) dc:title ?foo
If we are ok with that then the example is fine as is.
Brian
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 11:33:03 UTC